IPv6 Support and/or 6to4 Gateway
Allow native ipv6 connectivity, and/or tunnel transversal 6to4 4to6
Raymond Skinner
shared this idea
30 comments
-
Mike
commented
Another +1 for IPv6 routing. It’s becoming pretty standard now.
-
myfalcom
commented
+1 for IPv6. In a few years, China will deploy more and more IPv6 devices and users from home would have to connect Internet through IPv6.
So IPv6 support should be on the plan route. -
Alex
commented
IPv6 support is a must, many apps aren't supporting IPv4 as well anymore. Come on let's get a move on.
-
Chris
commented
ipv6 please
-
Anonymous
commented
+1 for Ipv6
-
Anonymous
commented
As a professional smart VPN provider, VyprVPN should add 'Disable IPv6 traffic' option . Most of the users generally want easy-to-use client software/app. Although it is easy to disable IPv6 in WIndows OS etc, but many don't know or like to always manually configure it. Many VPN companies already understood the point and added it.
-
Anonymous
commented
+1 for IPv6. What's the issue?
-
Mysterium
commented
+1 for Ipv6
-
Arlan
commented
Well I hope you do get it sorted ...I, for one, am thoroughly sick of being on the receiving end of "IPv6, - what's that?", "IPv6, - there is no call for it", + "what do you need IPv6 for?". I have native IPv6 from AA ISP (the only UK ISP to offer it) and I use it for connecting to my server ...or, at least, I can if I drop the Frog first ...c'mon, people, VPN service with no IPv6 is pointless ...and what about Chameleon options, too, - I note that they are not mentioned in the above?
-
josh4workemail@gmail.com
commented
We are paying for protection that is not provided....
Have brought this issue up now 4 times over the last 6 months to VYPR support. You will lose this and more customers without a fast resolution.
Please fix this.
-
Anonymous
commented
Would really like to see support for ipv6.
-
Anonymous
commented
What's the word on this???
-
Anonymous
commented
Need it bad, the latest version makes homegroup function in Windows unusable.
-
jonathan.r.hicks@gmail.com
commented
Any movement with this?
-
Anonymous
commented
okay, so... what is the status on this?
-
Anonymous
commented
It's 5 past 12! Think most of the VYPRVPN users don't know that they are unprotected if use IPv6.
-
Ian Wagner
commented
I would like to put in my request for this as well. The US is severely behind in IPv6 support, yes, but many of us actually do have IPv6 support, myself included. I am currently unprotected whenever I visit any IPv6 site, and this is just a little bit disconcerting.
-
Jerry Lerman
commented
The issue as I see it isn't the imminent non-support of ipv4 because of IP address exhaustion but rather that when on the VPN, ipv6 connections are not going through the VPN, and so there is no security. It's impressive how many sites are putting up IPV6 servers these days. This site included. Yep, I noticed that I'm connected here using IPV6. Ironically being on vyprvpn is not even protecting me from the VPN provider's own site! Ironic and a good example of the problem.
-
Anonymous
commented
I'm unable to connect to VyprVPN over Verizon's LTE network. I believe this is due to IPv6, but I can't be sure without using a rooted phone. Either way, IPv6 adoption is kicking up fast and the longer you ignore it the more problems it will introduce.
Your response sounds like you are hedging; waiting until everyone else adopts IPv6 before doing so yourself. This is not behavior I would expect from a premium VPN service.
-
Anonymous
commented
Any updates on IPv6?