Actually VyprVPN Router app works only up to version 132 (Release Date is October 2015). It is not working with latest Shibby version anymore.

Although it is a well-known issue there was no progress about 1 year:
https://forum.goldenfrog.com/t/tomato-app-version-combination/2672

Due many (security) fixes by Shibby the VyprVPN should also support the latest Shibby version again and the support should not stop at version 132.

Example: You have a Smart TV / Phone and want to protect your device using VPN, but some apps are using a VPN blocker (e.g. Netflix).

Instead of bypass VPN for given device it would be better to bypass the specific service (e.g. Netflix) by either Service / IP Range or domain.

The ASUSWRT Software is very well set up for managing an ASUS router. It would be great to be able to have the features from the VyprVPN app accessible through the ASUSWRT UI so that both can be used to a very powerful network set up.

VYPRVPN provide support for OPENWRT firmware running on many routers.
It will be nice to extend this support to the Gargoyle firmware (a front-end of OPENWRT).

It seems that the tomato shabby version of vyprvpn always connects the openvpn connections through the vyprvpn service. I'd like to see a way to stop that behavior, as I like to connect to my office with an openvpn connection using my router as an openvpn client. But when I enable the vypervpn, it's causing it to endpoint through vyprvpn and not my local ip address.

Would like to see an email notification when:
You are disconnected
You are connected

For both notifications it should list what server you were connected to and what protocol.

VyprVPN Router App - The app should automatically connect the default VPN server at router startup and not rely on the user to do. So if there is a power problem the router will restart and the VPN service with start automatically..

The router version of the app currently does not have a kill switch

I am using MPTCP system and UDP is not concerned, so I am limited to the maximum bandwith of one line (4.5 Mbps)..
I am used to connect to Vyprvpn using the app on a tomato routeur and find it really fine..
I hope the Vyprvpn OpenVPN over TCP implementation will be available soon to take full advantage of Vyprvpn on my network.

It would be great to be able to create a virtual VPN router app that can be added to things such as ESXI, Virtual box etc.

Support for AdvancedTomato. Such a nice router interface, it would be great to see VyprVPN support it also.

please build an applet for asus-wrt firmware by merlin

the other providers have it
take a look at

http://wiki.astrill.com/index.php/AstrillSetupManual:GettingstartedwithASUSMerlinfirmwarefor_routers

Please include support for Merlin firmware, a lot of asus routers out there running Merlin.

Please provide support for VyprVPN OpenVPN with PFSense.

All my devices MAC addresses have specific IP addresses (static IP) assigned to them using the "Static DHCP/ARP/IPT" section under "Basic"

Under the menu VyprVPN --> Per Device VPN you have a list of connected devices. Some of the device hostnames are not found.

All of my connected devices have hostnames assigned under the menu Basic --> Static DHCP/ARP/IPT.

It would be great if manually entered hostnames could be inherited from the Basic --> Static DHCP/ARP/IPT section to the VyprVPN --> Per Device VPN hostname section.

Hi, I would love to see vyprDNS available to dd-wrt configured routers!!

Hi,

Would like to suggest that the VyprVPN Router App Install Script be hosted on Github or somewhere other than the goldenfrog.com servers.

As you know the goldenfrog.com servers are blocked in China (if they are not yet they will be) - this makes installing the VyprVPN Router App impossible without manually moving the script somewhere unblocked.

The command I am referring to is:

eval wget -q -O - <a rel="nofollow noreferrer" href="http://www.goldenfrog.com/downloads/vyprvpn/router/app/tomato/arm/install.sh">http://www.goldenfrog.com/downloads/vyprvpn/router/app/tomato/arm/install.sh</a>

Peace

I need L2TP routers support because it is important than pptp

Please consider adding this option in the next iteration